<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why Diversity?	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richincolor.com/2014/09/why-diversity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richincolor.com/2014/09/why-diversity/</link>
	<description>Reading &#38; Reviewing Diverse YA Books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2023 20:34:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alison		</title>
		<link>http://richincolor.com/2014/09/why-diversity/#comment-170555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richincolor.com/?p=2883#comment-170555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I forgot I had commented on this post... are you sure they weren&#039;t counted separately? I think this (http://www.katehart.net/2012/05/uncovering-ya-covers-2011.html) is the post you&#039;re referring to and the Asian and Latin@ statistics are separate...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot I had commented on this post&#8230; are you sure they weren&#8217;t counted separately? I think this (<a href="http://www.katehart.net/2012/05/uncovering-ya-covers-2011.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.katehart.net/2012/05/uncovering-ya-covers-2011.html</a>) is the post you&#8217;re referring to and the Asian and Latin@ statistics are separate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: K. Imani Tennyson		</title>
		<link>http://richincolor.com/2014/09/why-diversity/#comment-98464</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K. Imani Tennyson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2014 01:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richincolor.com/?p=2883#comment-98464</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://richincolor.com/2014/09/why-diversity/#comment-96086&quot;&gt;Alison&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi and thanks for your question. At the time the research was conducted, Asians and Latin@s were counted together. I&#039;m sure that now the count would be separated. The statistics I stated are three years old, for what it&#039;s worth, so I hope if the count were done in 2014, the numbers would be different and for the better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://richincolor.com/2014/09/why-diversity/#comment-96086">Alison</a>.</p>
<p>Hi and thanks for your question. At the time the research was conducted, Asians and Latin@s were counted together. I&#8217;m sure that now the count would be separated. The statistics I stated are three years old, for what it&#8217;s worth, so I hope if the count were done in 2014, the numbers would be different and for the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alison		</title>
		<link>http://richincolor.com/2014/09/why-diversity/#comment-96086</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richincolor.com/?p=2883#comment-96086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is a great post, and I can&#039;t wait to read more of this series.

I just have a quick question about the stats at the beginning. Asians and Latin@s each make up 1.4% of characters represented on book covers, correct? The way it&#039;s written in the post it reads like they&#039;re being counted together (1.4% total for Asians and Latin@s rather than 1.4% individually, 2.8% total). Does that make any sense?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post, and I can&#8217;t wait to read more of this series.</p>
<p>I just have a quick question about the stats at the beginning. Asians and Latin@s each make up 1.4% of characters represented on book covers, correct? The way it&#8217;s written in the post it reads like they&#8217;re being counted together (1.4% total for Asians and Latin@s rather than 1.4% individually, 2.8% total). Does that make any sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
